Media follow-up to my series on Sydney’s incompatible metros

Both the Sydney Morning Herald and the ABC have followed up some of the issues raised in my two-part series on the way that decisions of the previous NSW state government have ensured that Sydney Metro will be far from the integrated network everyone thought it would be.

The headline of the SMH article published on 29 May 2023 captured the theme of my series: Why Sydney will end up with three incompatible metro train lines. The reporter, Matt O’Sullivan, summed up the substantial technical differences between the systems which I detailed in the series, including the fact that each line will be built and run by separate consortia.

This was followed up on the same day when I was interviewed on ABC Radio Sydney by the Afternoons presenter, Josh Szeps. In a wide-ranging conversation that ran for nearly 20 minutes we covered the key issues and also delved into the history behind the metro and its relationship to Sydney’s heavy rail network.

There has been a lot of feedback, particularly in response to the SMH article. By the following day the online version had generated over 350 comments, while eight letters to the editor relating to the article were also published. The overwhelming majority of these echoed my concerns about the previous government’s development of the metro “network” as three separate systems and some of the likely consequences.

Continue reading

Posted in Airport, Infrastructure, metro, Planning, Public Transport, Rail, Sydney Metro, Sydney metro area, Transport, Western Sydney | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Whatever the NSW election result, metros are the winner

As I write this post on the eve of the 2023 NSW state election, the major parties are neck-and-neck in the opinion polls. I’m not going to attempt to pick the result but there is already one clear winner, at least on paper – the Sydney metro network. .

There has been relatively little discussion about public transport policy during the campaign. The LNP government is basically promising more of the same – completion of theĀ  City and South West Metro and Parramatta Light Rail Stage 1, along with continued building of the Sydney West Airport Metro and Parramatta Light Rail Stage 2. It would also cut the weekly adult Opal card cap from $50 to $40, while the cap for concession holders would be cut from $25 to $20.

Meanwhile, the Labor opposition has committed to the same infrastructure projects, plus additional funding to ensureĀ  Parramatta Light Rail Stage 2 commences within the next term of government. It is also committing to a target of 50% minimum local content for future rolling stock contracts, ending the privatisation of public transport and improving bus services. It has not committed to the cut in the Opal cap.

The most significant differences have emerged over the construction of additional metro lines. In February the government made the announcement that it would “kick off the process of delivering four new metro lines in Western Sydney by undertaking the final business cases for the new routes” at a total cost of $260 million. The proposed lines are:

  • Tallawong to St Marys – 20 kilometres with six or seven potential stations
  • Westmead to the Aerotropolis – 37 kilometres with six or eight potential stations
  • Bankstown to Glenfield – 20 kilometres with the number of stations to be determined
  • Macarthur to the Aerotropolis – 23 kilometres with six to seven potential stations.

nws_12metrojoin

NSW Government proposed metro business cases. Sources: NSW Government and Sydney Morning Herald

Continue reading

Posted in Airport, Growth, Infrastructure, metro, Planning, Population, Public Transport, Rail, Sydney Metro, Sydney metro area, Transport, Western Sydney | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Sydney: why have one metro system when you can have two (or more)? Part 2

In the first post in this series I took a look at the significant differences between Sydney Metro Western Sydney Airport (Metro WSA) which will connect the new airport to the Sydney Trains network at St Marys, and the combined Sydney Metro Northwest and Metro City and Southwest (Metro NW/City/SW) which will run from Tallawong in the northwest to Bankstown in the southwest when it fully opens. I also discussed some of the wide-reaching ramifications of these differences for the development of the metro network.

In part two I’m looking at how the third line under construction, Sydney Metro West (see map below), fits into this picture and canvassing some possible scenarios for the long-term development of Sydneyā€™s metro lines.

SMW map

Sydney Metro West map (source: Sydney Metro EIS)

First, a quick recap. Metro WSA which is due to open in 2026, will be operated by Parklife Metro, a different consortium to the Metro Trains Sydney group of companies that is operating Metro NW/City/SW, the final stages of which will open in 2024/25. The airport line will use 25 kV AC electrification, unlike Metro NW/City/SW and the suburban and interurban rail networks, which all run on 1,500 V DC. Metro WSA is being constructed to handle three-car trains on opening but the station infrastructure can be expanded to accommodate four cars. This contrasts with Metro NW/City/SW which opened with six-car trains but has been designed to handle eight-car ones. 

In part one I concluded that the NSW government obviously wants to ensure that all future rail expansion in Sydney is through metro construction, but is also seeking to avoid a single-operator metro monopoly. In addition the first two metro lines have been designed around their primary purposes, to the point that they will be almost completely incompatible. More significantly, the limited design capacity of Metro WSA will constrain the lineā€™s longer-term future as outer Western Sydneyā€™s key north-south public transport corridor, even if the line is linked to and takes over the Glenfield to Leppington rail link as currently planned

Given the government has comprehensively separated the operations of Sydney’s first two metros, a third line adds another set of variables. I’ll try to explore some of these and the potential implications, but a word of warning – given that there is limited information about the design parameters for Metro West, especially as the key contracts to develop the stations and to provide, operate and maintain the trains have not yet been let, the following commentary is fairly speculative.

Continue reading

Posted in Infrastructure, metro, Planning, Public Transport, Rail, Sydney Metro, Sydney metro area, Transport, Western Sydney | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Sydney: why have one metro system when you can have two (or more)? Part 1

The second week of January 2023 featured extensive media coverage in the Sydney Morning Herald about the Sydney Metro. It’s unclear what triggered this, apart from the opening of the next stage of Metro City and Southwest from Chatswood to Sydenham in 12 to 18 months’ time, and of course the fact that the NSW state election is imminent.

Although the SMH articles were generally positive, they touched on the project’s controversial past, and how the fully automated and imported single-deck trains of Sydney’s first metro broke with the tradition of Sydney’s established double-deck rail network. They have also mentioned the project’s somewhat uncertain post-Covid present, and how the pandemic and a protracted industrial dispute have contributed to the delay in completing the final stage from Sydenham to Bankstown to 2025.

While the media highlight was on Metro City and Southwest, the NSW Government has also commenced the construction of two more lines and released long-term plans for future metros. This underscores the NSW government’s ambition that all future expansion of Sydney’s rail network will be achieved through the extension of these lines and eventually the construction of additional metros.Ā 

It is easy to jump from this to a second conclusion – that the government will turn the current disconnected projects into an single seamless metro system as an alternative to the current suburban rail network. However, the notion that the government wants full integration of the metro lines may be an oversimplification. It seems that instead of getting one metro, we will end up with two – and possibly three or even more – distinct and, to varying degrees, incompatible systems.

This is becoming clearer as construction of the Sydney Metro Western Sydney Airport (Metro WSA) line gets underway and the differences between it and the combined Sydney Metro Northwest and Metro City and Southwest (Metro NW/City/SW) emerge. I’ll take a look at these differences and their implications in this article, while in the second part I’ll look at how the third line under construction, Sydney Metro West, fits into this picture and canvass some possible scenarios for the long-term development of Sydney’s metro lines.

Metro Map Appendix E- Design Guidelines (1)

Sydney Metro lines in operation or under construction, and selected proposed extensions and lines (source: Sydney Metro)

Ā 

Continue reading

Posted in Airport, Bradfield, metro, Planning, Public Transport, Rail, Sydney Metro, Sydney metro area, Transport, Western Sydney | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Western Sydney and the City Deal: a precursor to metropolitan governance reform?

cover_issue_505_en_USRecently, along with three other authors from Commonwealth countries, I was asked by the editors of the Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance to prepare a short “perspective” on issues and trends in metropolitan governance in response to a paper by Zack Taylor on Regionalism from Above: Metropolitan Governance in Canada.

In my paper – Western Sydney and the City Deal: a precursor to metropolitan governance reform? – I took a look at the changing face of governance in Western Sydney and in particular the implications of the “Western Sydney City Deal”. While this was the main focus, I was able in a few paragraphs to reflect on the attempts that the Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils (WSROC) made before and during my time there as CEO from 1996 to 2008 to engage collaboratively with the state government and to form broad governance partnerships “from the ground up” with other regional organisations in order to improve infrastructure and service provision for Western Sydney’s fast-growing population. While these strategies were successful initially in influencing government funding and planning priorities they met increasing resistance. I observed that WSROC “lacked the resources and authority to develop a sustained cross-sector collaborative governance model”.

The structure of the region has also changed greatly. Previously, communities of interest had evolved along the road and rail corridors radiating east to west through the region from central Sydney, but the development of growth centres and the completion of the M7 orbital Motorway introduced new links between outer metropolitan communities along a northā€“south axis. The eight outer western councils began to see themselves as a group facing distinctly different issues compared to the more-established councils in the eastern part of the region.

More recently the decision to build Sydney’s second airport at the mid-point of this corridor and the designation by the Greater Sydney Commission of this sub-region as the “Western Parkland City” as part of a restructure of the metropolitan area into three “30-minute” cities. The airport was also the focus the federal governmentā€™s Western Sydney City Deal, signed in 2016 which sought to establish a collaborative partnership between the federal government, NSW government and the eight councils. As well as providing substantial funding for transport infrastructure, a range of employment, education, housing and environmental initiatives and a new “Aerotropolis” close to the airport, the City Deal also involves additional collaboration arrangements which see all three levels of government working together to deliver these outcomes.

I conclude that while these arrangements appear to be working well, they are designed “to implement the commitments of the City Deal rather than to provide an enduring model of metropolitan governance”. However, “the participating municipalities may be developing a capacity and enthusiasm for working collaboratively at a metropolitan scale, and for engaging with federal and state governments on a more equal footing, rather than as subordinates”, and these arrangements “may yet provide a catalyst for the evolution of more inclusive and equitable forms of metropolitan governance”.

Posted in Airport, Governance, Growth, Local Government, ROCs, Sydney metro area, Western Sydney | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Laborā€™s High Speed Rail proposal ā€“ too far, or not far enough?

Opposition leader Anthony Albanese today announced that Labor would ā€œmake fast rail connections between Sydney, the Central Coast and Newcastle a realityā€ and establish a High-Speed Rail Authority if it wins government in next yearā€™s federal election. Unfortunately, it’s hard not to be cynical about High Speed Rail (HSR) pre-election promises in Australian politics given their perfect track record of non fulfillment, but in this case it is just possible that the stars might align for Albanese’s promise to actually be kept if Labor wins office. If so, this raises another question ā€“ does his proposal go far enough?

It is now just over three years since the former NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian and then Transport Minister Andrew Constance made their “Fast Rail” announcement, stating that “The NSW Government will start work on a fast rail network in the next [ie, the 2019-23] term of government, linking regional centres to each other and Sydney, significantly slashing travel times across the State.” So far, very little has happened, apart from an announcement in April that there will be an upgrade of the NSW South Coast corridor.

NSW Fastrail map

NSW Fast Rail potential routes identified for investigation back in 2018. Source: NSW Fast Rail Future website

Continue reading

Posted in Fast Rail, Infrastructure, Public Transport, Rail, Regions, Transport | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sydney Metro West gets a mega CBD interchange and Star Casino hits the jackpot, but no southeast link

Two more pieces in the Sydney Metro West puzzle were revealed in the recent announcement by the NSW Government of the location of the remaining stations on the line ā€“ Pyrmont and Hunter Street. The announcement itself was not a great surprise, as the general location of these stations has been foreshadowed for some time. However, the revelation of their exact locations has several interesting implications.

The first of these is confirmation that Hunter Street Station will play a pivotal role in a mega transport interchange underneath the northern part of the Sydney central business district (CBD). The second is the close proximity of Pyrmont station to the casino and how that may influence the redevelopment of the Pyrmont peninsula, which is similar in some respects to the relationship between Barangaroo station and the partially-opened Crown Casino.

However, one puzzle piece is likely to remain missing indefinitely ā€“ an extension of the metro to Sydneyā€™s southeast. This along with several aspects of the metroā€™s design points to some of the compromises being made in the face of the projectā€™s rising cost.

First, a very brief recap: Sydney Metro West (SMW) will be Sydneyā€™s second metro line, stretching 24 kilometres from Westmead in Western Sydney to the city centre. Station locations have previously been confirmed at Westmead, Parramatta, Sydney Olympic Park, North Strathfield, Burwood North, Five Dock and The Bays.

Proposed Sydney West Metro route. Source: Transport for NSW

Continue reading

Posted in metro, Planning, Public Transport, Rail, Sydney Metro, Sydney metro area, Transport, Western Sydney | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

COVID-19 and Non-Government Organisations

In addition to this blog I also host another called Sociamind which provides information about MindManager (MM) mind mapping software. I usually discuss things like the key features of the latest version, or explore how you can use these features in unusual ways to accomplish specific tasks. Iā€™m a director of a small company and Iā€™m also involved in several non-profit non-government organisations (NGOs) which manage small projects, so I often have these in mind when I develop ideas for posts on my blog.

These are not normal times, however. As the world responds to COVID-19ā€™s terrible toll, millions of peopleā€™s lives have been upended. As countries try to contain the virus, businesses and other organizations have closed, suspended or radically altered their activities.

Almost all community, social and cultural activities have also come to an abrupt halt as social distancing and isolation kicks in. While itā€™s the cancellations of the big events which have attracted the most attention, thousands of local fetes, markets, concerts, sporting events, performances, exhibitions and other activities put on by small (NGOs) have suffered the same fate.

In collaboration with MindManager Iā€™ve turned what Iā€™ve learnt from working with several NGOs which are going through this process to develop a COVID-19 NGO Pause Strategy which may be helpful to other organisations. This article, which also includes ideas on how to continue some activities online, has just been posted on the MindManager blog: https://www.mindjet.com/blog/2020/04/202004how-non-government-organizations-can-manage-the-impacts-of-covid-19/

Posted in NGO | Tagged | Leave a comment

Meet REM: Sydney Metroā€™s Canadian twin

A fully automated metro system over 65 kilometres long is under staged construction in a major city and is expected to be fully open by the early 2020s. Using technology supplied by European rail company Alstom and trains manufactured in India, the stand-alone system will link suburbs with the heart of the city ā€“ but it represents also a controversial break with the past.

Sounds a lot like the Sydney Metro ā€“ but itā€™s also an equally accurate description of the RĆ©seau express mĆ©tropolitain (REM – Metropolitan Express Network) currently under construction in Montreal, Canada. As well as being nearly identical in length, technologies and construction timeframes, both systems are also a contentious departure from existing heavy rail practices in their host cities. Not only are they technologically incompatible with existing rail networks, they also involve the takeover and conversion of established and functional suburban rail infrastructure.

In previous posts I have compared Sydney Metro with broadly similar projects currently under construction in Australia and New Zealand, as well as with Londonā€™s Crossrail. However, the similarities between REM and the Sydney Metro are much more striking. In this post Iā€™ll compare these projects and in part two Iā€™ll discuss the controversies in both cities around the parallel decisions to construct stand-alone transit systems.

Montreal REM map. Source: REM website

Sydney Metro. Source: Wikipedia

Continue reading

Posted in metro, Public Transport, Sydney Metro, Western Sydney | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Sydney Metro West update: the government goes for speed over coverage

Yesterday’s release of a Project Overview detailing the station locations for the planned Sydney Metro West between Westmead and the Sydney CBD largely confirms the state governmentā€™s previous announcements as well as analysis in this blog and elsewhere. It also reaffirms the governmentā€™s intention that the trip is planned to be a speedy one, with between only five and seven stations and a travel time target of around 20 minutes between Parramatta and the CBD.

This also means that the new line follows the model of the recently opened Sydney Metro Northwest which has a high average distance between stations, though similarly the stations will be ā€œclumpedā€ in several groups along the way. One key difference however is that in north-western Sydney the station locations largely reflect the current and planned uneven development patterns of the region, unlike the relatively even densities along the proposed route of the Sydney Metro West. This means that a number of key locations in this corridor will miss out on metro service.

The Project Overview is consistent with the governmentā€™s previous announcements and provides some clarity about how the metro will operate and its interaction with other transport infrastructure and services. However, it also points to a range of still-unanswered questions, for example the location of the CBD station, the location of stations at Rydalmere or Pyrmont, and indeed whether these stations will be built at all.

Sydney West Metro map. Source: NSW Government

Continue reading

Posted in metro, Public Transport, Sydney Metro, Transport | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment